https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/political-cartoonists-on-navigating-a-changing-media-landscape
I’ve personally shied away from outright divisive political commentary in my own work out of the fear of losing audience*, but lately I’ve seen more and more creators take a stand. In some regards, it is jarring when you find out someone you admired, and enjoyed the work of, is strongly opposed to your personal views and even hostile to your beliefs. In other ways, knowing where a creator stands helps you admire and respect them even more. But for either to happen, that creator must step out from behind the stage curtains and speak on their own behalf. I can’t deny that I’ve been disappointed to find out that some creators I respected and admired so much are sometimes wildly undeserving of my admiration (I won’t list the names).
But not so with editorial cartooning. They’re pitching directly across the plate from day one and you have no doubt where they stand. I can’t help but respect that. When you couple their talent as draftsman, it’s harder not to envy their careers. I just wish it wasn’t a dying artform, as the above PBS News Hour piece seems to indicate.
The PBS video mentions Thomas Nast and his battle against Tammany Hall in the late 1800’s; If you’re curious about that, here’s a article you can visit: https://www.mcny.org/story/thomas-nast-takes-down-tammany-cartoonists-crusade-against-political-boss.
Thinking about what Nast achieved, I still have hope that editorial cartooning may see an opportunity to balance the scales against power abuses in my lifetime.
~~~
*Not to say that I’ve avoided it completely…
https://unfedartist.com/comic/dentaldebate/
https://unfedartist.com/comic/zeropollution/
https://unfedartist.com/comic/making-a-difference-politics/